Case Study: Misclassification of Consultants as Employees – TDS & EPF Compliance Risk

Case Study: Consultants Classified as Employees under EPF Act

Case:

Gain Financial Consultants (P) Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Relevant Law:

Income Tax Act (TDS u/s 192 vs 194J) and EPF Act

Court:

Bombay High Court

Date:

14 March 2001

Background

Although many companies deduct TDS under Section 194J (professional fees) for individuals who, in reality, work exclusively for them, this may seem convenient at first. However, when such individuals also follow office hours, report to a supervisor, and use company infrastructure, they are, in effect, employees under the EPF Act. A similar situation arose in Gain Financial Consultants (P) Ltd. v. RPFC, where the company claimed to have only 17 regular employees (below the EPF coverage threshold) and designated four others as “consultants” or “retainers.”

Legal Issue

The key question is whether such individuals, who are engaged full-time, paid fixed monthly amounts, and consistently performing work under the company’s direction, should therefore be classified as “employees” under Section 2(f) of the EPF Act. Furthermore, it must be determined whether TDS should instead be deducted under Section 192 (salary) rather than Section 194J (professional fees).

Judgment

The Bombay High Court (14 March 2001) ruled that the four retainers were, in fact, employees because they:

• Worked exclusively and regularly for the company
• Received fixed remuneration
• Had no independent establishment
• Performed core functions under the company’s direction

In practice, similar misclassification can lead to:

• Retrospective PF & ESIC liability
• Penalties for non-payment of gratuity and other benefits
• Tax non-compliance for wrong TDS section applied

Conclusion

Therefore, titles like “consultant” or “retainer” do not exempt individuals from being treated as employees, especially if their working conditions clearly show an employer-employee relationship. But in fact, both under tax law and labour law, the functional reality ultimately outweighs contractual labels.

Key Learning

✅ Always classify workforce based on actual work conditions and control.
✅ If a person works like an employee, deduct TDS u/s 192 and provide PF, ESIC, gratuity, and other statutory benefits.
✅ Seek professional compliance advice before engaging someone as a “consultant” to avoid future disputes and penalties.

Join the community that’s changing the way businesses handle compliance in India.